Katz v. Hoberman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Upon reargument, we adhere to our original decision and memorandum and write further only to touch upon certain questions suggested on the reargument — one as to the propriety of the common practice of using questions propounded on previous examinations and the other as to the practicability of excising the questions here in dispute.
The examination was canceled, before any of the papers had been graded, when the commission learned that it had been mis*972taken in believing that there had not been released to the public the California examination from which it had extracted and used,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mills v. BahouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Elliott v. HobermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Police Sergeant (Pm3776v)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Goodman v. Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Clare v. KirwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.