Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.

At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, tbe defendant, Southern, moved for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe court overruled this motion and tbe defendant, Southern, duly excepted and assigned error.

At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, tbe defendant, Seaboard, moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe court overruled this motion and tbe defendant, Seaboard, duly excepted and assigned error.

Tbe defendant, Seaboard, then rested without offering testimony and renewed its motion for judgment of nonsuit at tbe close of all tbe evidence. Tbe court overruled…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Amos v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Hassell v. Onslow County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Hassell v. Onslow County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API