Legal Opinion

Nashville Bank v. Hays

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This cause was argued by Mr. G. S. Yerger lor the plaintiff in error, the Nashville Bank, and by Mr. W. L. Brown for the defendants; — the facts of the case are fully stated in the opinions of the judges.

1Opinion of the Court

Catron, Judge.

This action was brought upon a promissory note, (and the endorsements thereon) made by Edmund Lanier to the Bank, on the 4th day of October 1820, for $5000, due sixty days after date in the ordinary form, endorsed by F. Grundy, Andrew Hays and O. B. Hays, the defendant. The note sued on was a renewal of a note for the same amount, given by E. Lanier to the Bank the 24th November 1819, endorsed by the parties aforesaid.

It is contended the first note was usurious; so the jury *244found in the Circuit Court, and deducted the excess according to the statute of 1819, ch. 32.

The first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenhow's administratrix v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1820
  2. Long v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API