Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zuntz v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1878No. 7093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

REPLICATION for writs of mandamus and prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mare, J.

On motion the suspensive appeal granted in this case was set aside, on the ground that one of the sureties in the appeal bond was not legally sufficient, because he resides in the Sixth Municipal District of the city of New Orleans.

The bond in this case is not solidary but joint, each surety binding *583himself for part only of the amount; and the single question is as to the sufficiency of one of them, J. D. Britton, on the ground stated.

In the cases of Remmers, and State vs. Williams, both reported in 29th Annual, we had occasion to review the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart v. HeilnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  2. Mayor of New-Orleans v. RipleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
  3. Toby & Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1835
  4. Thompson v. ChrétienSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  5. Bank of Louisiana v. SterlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Southern Wood Distillates & Fiber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Clement v. NaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API