Gingerich v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentScott, J.
I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the Kentucky Constitution unquestionably affords greater protection to the free exercise of religion than does the Federal Constitution. Accordingly, any law interfering with an individual’s free exercise of religion must pass strict scrutiny or else be declared unconstitutional. Given that KRS 189.820 cannot pass strict scrutiny, Appellants’ convictions cannot stand. Thus, I would reverse the Court of Appeals’ judgment.
I. KENTUCKY’S CONSTITUTION
I begin by rejecting the majority’s conclusion that Kentucky’s Constitution does not afford greater protection…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.