Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 25, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Justice.

Upon receiving word that his two sons, the appellants John Robert and Tounsel *241Haynes, were engaged in what might be called a “shoot-out” with William Caudill, the appellant Joe Haynes armed himself with a rifle, went to the scene of the affray, and shot and killed Caudill. The three Hayneses were jointly indicted for murder, found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment. KRS 43S.020. They appeal.

The case on John Robert and Tounsel Ray as aiders and abettors is very close, falling somewhere between Smiddy v. Com., 210 Ky. 359, 275 S.W. 872…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Smiddy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Alexander v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Willoughby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API