Legal Opinion

Wile v. Burns Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1933No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The relief sought in the first Wile action is similar to that requested in Wile v. Burns Bros., No. 1, 239 App. Div. 59), argued herewith, which is referred to as the second Wile action. Since the denial by the Special Term of the motion herein, Mr. Justice Glennon on April 28, 1933, by order, required the plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint, making it more definite and certain. The amended complaint has not yet been served. The appeal, therefore, should be dismissed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Finch, P. J., Merrell and Townley, JJ., concur; McAvoy, J., taking no part.

App…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wile v. Burns Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wile v. Burns Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. General Investment Corp. v. WarrinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API