Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 25, 1932No. Docket No. 47804Published

As special counsel under the back-tax law of Arkansas, receiving commissions as compensation, petitioner was neither an officer nor employee of that State or of its subdivision.

1Opinion of the Court

R. E. L. JOHNSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Johnson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 47804.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

25 B.T.A. 359; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1536;

January 25, 1932, Promulgated

As special counsel under the back-tax law of Arkansas, receiving commissions as compensation, petitioner was neither an officer nor employee of that State or of its subdivision.

B. B. Turner, Esq., for the petitioner.

O. W. Swecker, Esq., for the respondent.

LANSDON

OPINION.

LANSDON: The respondent asserts deficiencies in income taxes for the years 1925, 1926, 1927 and 1928, in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API