Legal Opinion

United States v. 3935 Cases of Distilled Spirits

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1944No. Civil Action 1065PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, District Judge.

It is alleged by the Government that the owners of the. seized property, who were licensed to do business as retailers, violated the Internal Revenue laws by engaging in business as wholesalers without payment of the wholesale dealers occupational tax required by Section 3253 of Title 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code; without making the reports required to be kept by wholesale liquor dealers pursuant to the provisions of Section 2857 of Title 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, or- without securing a basic permit to purchase distilled spirits for resale at wholesale as required by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. United States v. WinnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1838
  5. United States v. ZagerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. WindleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. One 1941 Buick Sedan, Motor Number 64286106 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial Number 15051526District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. United States v. One 1942 Pontiac Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944
  5. One Ford Tudor Automobile v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API