Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Shepard Barclay, Judge. (1) The admitted,, undisturbed, peaceable, open and notorious possession and enjoyment of the premises in controversy by the appellant and those under whom it derives title in this suit, claiming title thereto for a period of forty-five years, not only gave the appellant perfect title thereto, but made it unlawful for the respondents to interfere with that possession by tearing down that part of the…

Read the full summary

Appeal from, St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Shepard Barclay, Judge. (1) The admitted,, undisturbed, peaceable, open and notorious possession and enjoyment of the premises in controversy by the appellant and those under whom it derives title in this suit, claiming title thereto for a period of forty-five years, not only gave the appellant perfect title thereto, but made it unlawful for the respondents to interfere with that possession by tearing down that part of the building projecting upon the sidewalk of Market street. The statutes of limitation in this state prior to the year 1865…

1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.

— This is an action to restrain the city of St. Louis from removing, as an obstruction, without compensation, so much of a brick building on the south side of Market street, in said city, as projects beyond the' line of said street, of which, as at present located, the plaintiff and those under whom it claims, had been in the open, notorious, peaceable, continuous and adverse possession and occupancy, claiming title thereto for more than thirty years before this suit was commenced. The building was erected in 1840. The street was dedicated in 1846, and in improving it, the city conformed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of St. Charles v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. School Directors of St. Charles v. GoergesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Callaway County v. NolleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1861
  4. Abernathy v. DennisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Wickersham v. WoodbeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Hays v. City of Poplar BluffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Mississippi County v. VowelsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. TotmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Bonsor v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API