Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 9, 1997No. 95-7354, 96-7529/96-7530Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMansmann, J.

I write separately because I am convinced that the testimonial privilege issue raised by the Virgin Islands appeal is substantially different from that presented in the Delaware appeals1 and should be resolved in favor of the targeted son. The Virgin Islands appeal, which challenges the denial of a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena, requires that we confront an issue of first impression in our circuit: should we make available to a parent and child an evidentiary privilege which could be invoked to prevent compelling that parent to testify regarding confidential communications made to the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Cabello v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API