Legal Opinion

Bound v. South Carolina Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Frederick W. 'Bound against the South Carolina- Itoilway Company and others to foreclose a mortgage. Motion to postpone sale granted. For the history of fids litiga!ion, see prior reports: 46 Fed. Rep. 315; 47 Fed. Rep. 30; 50 Fed. Rep. 312 and 853 ; 51 Fed. Rep. 58.

1Opinion of the Court

SlMO'NTiM, District Judge.

On the 23d day of February, 1803, a motion was made ta this court to postpone the sale of the South Carolina Kailway Company, ordered for i'ttfa, April, 1893. The canso bad come on to a hearing on 2d day of May, 3892, and svb opinion was filed on 29th day of June, 1892. See 50 Fed. Rep. 853. That opinion was formulated into a final decree on. 23d day of November, 1892. The chief matter of contest waa as to the mode of sale. There were a number of liens upon the properly, differing in priority. The judgment obtained by Henry Thomas Coghlam — a decree for sale--was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mueller v. EhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. French v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan Co. v. Oregon Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Union Trust Co. v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gaffney v. KentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Mootry v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  5. Fulton Inv. Co. v. DorsetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API