Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ferraez

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 2003No. G031123PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Defendant Antonio Rafael Ferraez was convicted of possessing for sale cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5) and street terrorism (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury also found true the allegation that the first offense was committed to benefit or assist a criminal street gang (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)). The trial court sentenced defendant to four years for the drug offense and a concurrent term of two years for the gang offense, staying the sentence on the gang allegation.

Defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. OchoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. Frank S.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. RiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Andrew Khac VuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API