Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rimoldi v. Schanzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1989Published

1Concurrence

Thompson, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to reverse the order appealed from and grant the Millmans’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, with the following memorandum in which Spatt, J., concurs. I concur with my learned colleagues in the majority that the plaintiffs’ statutory claims against the defendant homeowners, Samuel and Adrianne Millman, asserted pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 11, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 USC § 654 [a]) and Education Law § 3215 (1) should be dismissed because the plaintiffs’ decedents were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API