White v. Balta
New York Court of Common Pleas
Action by EEza W. White against Jose Balta for rent. A judgment in favor of plaintiff was affirmed on appeal (27 FT. Y. Supp. 902), and defendant moves for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. Denied.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
The motion is reprehensible. It asks the privüege of an appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment of this court affirming the judgment of the district court for a sum less than a hundred dollars. The action was for a month’s rent of a storeroom, and, upon the trial, only issues of fact were in controversy. It is not pretended in the moving papers that the case involves any question of law at aE, much less one “which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals.” Code, § 191, subd. 3. Does counsel suppose that our highest tribunal is instituted for the purpose of entertaining anew the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bicknell v. SpierNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Wallace v. DinninyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895