Legal Opinion
(HC) Davis v. Neuschmid
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 7, 2021No. 2:18-cv-02682Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DORIAN DAVIS, No. 2:18-cv-2682 AC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 20 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Stephen Christian, A/K/A Stephen Cline v. William RhodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.