Legal Opinion

Ames v. Ames

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1961No. C-216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.

Appellant husband, who was defendant in an action for divorce, has appealed from a post decretal order which denied his motion to bring into the suit by appropriate process additional parties for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of the final decree, and which ex mero motu deleted, vacated and held for naught one of the provisions of the final decree relating to a settlement of the property rights of the parties.

The complaint for divorce filed by plaintiff wife was in the usual form and charged the husband with extreme cruelty. After institution of the suit the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Schraner v. SchranerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Kurtz v. KurtzSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Martin v. Arrow CabsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Macaulay v. Wachovia Bank of South Carolina, N.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Woods v. ButterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. MacAulay v. WACHOVIA BANK OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API