Legal Opinion

MacQuinn v. Patterson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 24, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.

This action in assumpsit upon an account annexed is before us on exceptions by the plaintiff to the acceptance of a referee’s report. The exceptions are overruled.

The issue is whether the defendant is liable to the plaintiff for making a gravel fill on defendant’s premises. Findings by the referee in favor of plaintiff on all other items in the account are not questioned. There is no dispute about the reasonableness of plaintiff’s charges of $550 for gravel and $128 for use of a bulldozer, or a total of $678 for the fill. The issue is liability and not damage.

The principles governing our…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Staples v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  2. Hawkins v. Maine & New Hampshire Theaters Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Heath v. StoddardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  4. Flood v. EarleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  5. Knowlton v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colvin v. BarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  2. Withers v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API