Legal Opinion

State v. Madrid

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 17, 2008No. 35952-9-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Penoyar, A.C.J.

¶1 A jury convicted Jeffrey P. Madrid for nine counts of violating a protection order issued on behalf of his estranged wife, Dixie, and his stepdaughter, AP. Seven of the nine counts stem from letters Madrid wrote to Dixie but sent to Dixie’s mother, who delivered them to Dixie several months later. Madrid argues that (1) his convictions on all nine counts should be vacated because the penalty provision statute for protection order violations (former RCW 26.50.110(1) (2000)) was ambiguous and (2) the delivery of the seven letters supports only one conviction for violation of a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. MadridCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API