Dawson v. Vrostyak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 30, April T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Westmoreland Co., August T., 1916, No. 562, discharging rule to open judgment in the case of George W. Dawson v. Frank Vrostyak. Rule to open judgment. Before Copeland, P. J. of Q. C., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court discharged the rule to open judgment. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is an appeal from refusal of the court below to open a judgment entered by confession upon a warrant contained in a judgment note. The defendant presented *346Ms petition to the court below alleging three grounds upon which the judgment ought to be opened. (1) That he had never signed the note and that his signature thereto was a forgery. (2) That any negotiations between the plaintiff and the defendant were carried on on the 4th of July, 1916, and resulted in the purchase of certain real estate by the defendant from the plaintiff upon written agreement; the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Cape May Real Estate Co. v. HendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Robeson v. PelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902