Legal Opinion

Giano v. Duncan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting violation of urinalysis testing procedures after he admittedly refused to obey a direct order to provide a urine sample for testing. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 contending that he was deprived of a fair hearing. Supreme Court dismissed petitioner’s application, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, he was not denied the right to present a defense. The case law makes clear that a hearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burse v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. De Leon v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nimmons v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Edwards v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API