Legal Opinion
Putnam Riverview v. Yankee Gas Services, No. 27 90 20 (Feb. 19, 1991)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 19, 1991No. 27 90 20Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiffs, Putnam Riverview, Inc., Zoltan Guttman, CT Page 1052 Harry Hirsch, Joseph Voll, Mike Hirsch, and Arnold Portnoy ("Putnam") seek a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant UST Bank/Connecticut ("the bank") from paying any amount to defendant Yankee Gas Services Company ("Yankee") under the terms of a certain letter of credit. The plaintiff's verified complaint alleges that the letter of credit at issue was obtained from the bank and provided to Connecticut Light and Power…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Rockwell International Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Citibank, N.A. And Bank Tejarat, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Deming v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Covenant Radio Corporation v. Ten Eighty CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.