Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 31, 2000, which ruled that claimant was *781disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a machine operator, and other fellow employees objected to the mandatory weekend overtime schedule posted by the employer. The employer instructed claimant to go home and return on Monday for a meeting. On Monday, claimant was informed that she was suspended for two days due to her conduct. Claimant left and failed to return to work at the end…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EcklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SemkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of SgroiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API