Shapiro v. Drummond, Woodsum, Plimpton & MacMahon

ROBERTS, Justice.

Andrew B. Shapiro appeals from the denial by the Superior Court, Cumberland County (Brennan, J.) of his motion for an order commencing summary proceedings against Drummond, Woodsum, Plimpton & MacMahon, P.A., pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 7101-7105 (1980). Shapiro’s only argument on appeal is that “the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in ruling that summary proceedings ... were inappropriate.” We affirm.

Although the facts were submitted informally to the trial court, Shapiro concedes, for the purposes of this appeal, that the facts are undisputed. The defendant law firm…