Thompson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
We reverse the denial of Barron Thompson’s motion for postconviction relief that *564he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because it was neither untimely nor successive, as found by the postconviction court.
The two-year period for Thompson to file his rule 3.850 motion expired on May 15, 2010. Thompson certified that he placed his motion in the hands of prison officials on May 12, 2010; however, the motion was not stamped filed by the clerk of the circuit court until June 16, 2010. The postconviction court erred when it ruled the motion as untimely.
[A]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Blake v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Edmondson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hector Colon v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Hector Colon v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016