Legal Opinion

Howland v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Monmouth Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

*19The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

The defendant was indicted for the larceny of a check. He was convicted of embezzlement. The facts proved were these: The cheek was payable to one Frank Benson. Benson took the check to the store of one Levy, and, after endorsing the check, left it with Levy’s son. He was to call the next morning and get the cash for the check. Young Levy placed the cheek in a safe standing in the store. Howland, the defendant, was in the store at the time. Some words passed between Howland and young Levy in respect to Howland’s ability to open the safe.

Levy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Hagerman v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. KochNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. State v. MinceyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Tramonte v. A. J. Rasmussen & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API