Johnson v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Judge.
*51 This case requires us to consider whether the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in applying the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, rather than the Price Waterhouse mixed-motive burden-shifting framework, in determining a claim of alleged discrimination on the basis of sex. We conclude the ALJ applied the incorrect burden-shifting framework. While we reverse and remand for further proceedings, we dismiss as moot Appellant's argument that the ALJ erred in concluding that NCDPS improperly denied her veteran's preference.
BACKGROUND
On 7 February 2017, the North…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.