Legal Opinion

State v. Van Brunt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1944No. 29357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted on an information charging him, jointly with several others, with larceny of a yearling bull calf, the true owner being unknown, on October 10, 1941. He appeals.

His confession introduced in evidence is as follows:

“I, Gerald Van Brunt, make the following statement and confession of my own free will and accord after being fully advised of all my legal rights and without promise of immunity or without threat being made to me. Sometime in the fall of 1941 Dick Peasley met me in Omak and wanted to know if I would like to take a ride to Nespelem. Dick had a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. George v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. SusanWashington Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. WintersWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. SedamWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Giron v. CranorDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API