Legal Opinion
Fowke v. Darnall
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 8, 1824PublishedCited by 15 opinions
From the Montgomery Circuit Court,
1Opinion of the Court
*316Opi.NION op THE CQÜRT,
B5T JüDGE MlLLS.
THIS is an ejectment. There was first a verdict for the plaintiff, which the court below set aside, and grant-a new trial, and'on the second trial a verdict and judgement were rendered for the defendant below, from the lessors of the plaintiff have appealed, It is for that the court below erred
in granting a new trial. It was moved for, on the grounds that the verdict was against law and evidence; that the instructions of the court to the jury during the progress of the first trial were erroneous; and also on ¡jle ground of surprise, attempted to be proved…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jackson ex dem. Smith v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1807
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boone v. ChilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Seymour v. CreswellSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
- Badger v. LyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Crommelin v. MinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Rice v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.