Collier v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
On March 24, 1965, a jury in a federal district court found petitioner guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U. S. C. § 2421 (1964 ed.), and a formal judgment was entered against him on the same day. Nine days later, on April 2, 1965, a new trial motion was filed by petitioner’s counsel alleging various errors at trial. Since Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 33 expressly requires that a new trial motion not based on newly discovered evidence be filed within five days of the verdict, petitioner’s motion was untimely and the District Court denied it on April 5, 1965. On April 12, 1965, seven days after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- George Stine Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Thomas Anthony BertoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Print Carter O'Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States of America, (Docket Nos. 83-1204, 83-1205) v. Charles O. Dukes, and Charles O. Dukes, (Docket No. 83-2185) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Patrick R. Kennedy v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Elam Reamuel TempleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Merle R. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Rafferty v. State, Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.