Legal Opinion

Russell v. Board of Elections

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order is affirmed on the memorandum of the Appellate Division. In doing so, we note that the legislative intent to limit the acceptability of authenticating statements made pursuant to section 6-132 of the Election Law to ones signed by notaries public or commissioners of deeds becomes especially plain when the words of that statute are contrasted with the far broader language of the predecessor statute which it replaced. The latter, former section 135 of the Election Law, did not specify notaries, commissioners or others, *802but expressly included any "officer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dyte v. LawleyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dyte v. LawleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luck v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Roe v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API