Legal Opinion

Magiera v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 2004No. 02-17364Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of their suit against William Bills and Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton, in her official capacity, for actions arising out of a dispute over the governance of the Winnemucea Indian Colony in Winnemucea, Nevada. We affirm the district court. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the United States has unequivocally waived its sovereign immunity, and Plaintiffs have not pursued their claims against Bills on appeal. The facts are known to the parties and we do not recite them.

We review de novo dismissals based on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Clarissa Brady,plaintiff-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API