Legal Opinion
MacAluso v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 28, 2005No. 2D04-1214PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
912 So.2d 694 (2005)
Vincent MACALUSO, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D04-1214.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 28, 2005.
2Per curiam
Vincent Macaluso, Jr., appeals the denial of his postconviction motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for the postconviction court to enter an order of dismissal because Macaluso's rule 3.800(a) motion is facially insufficient.
Macaluso originally filed a motion raising both rule 3.800(a) and rule 3.850 claims. In Macaluso v. State, 836 So.2d…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Prince v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Spears v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Rangel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.