Legal Opinion

Qualley v. Citizens Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 4, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from WmnesMek District Court. — H. E. TayloR, Judge. The appellant demands a reversal because certain testimony offered by him was excluded.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

I. The defendant bank held a mortgage on the lands of plaintiff. It entered into an arrangement with him through- which it received a -deed to said lands from him. Concurrently with the deed, a contract was made, which, among other things, reserved possession in the grantor for a stated time. The tenant of the grantor paid into the defendant bank $1,000 rent money. The bank refused to pay this sum to the landlord, this plaintiff, on the ground that he had injured the bank in a sum much larger than $1,000 by the making of alleged false representations at the time the bank took deed and made…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. ConnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API