Legal Opinion

Waldron v. Lapidus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1931No. 27684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to recover a balance alleged to be due on a contract for legal services. Defendant denied the terms of the contract and set up a counterclaim to recover for overpayment. There was a directed judgment for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

The only error complained of is the refusal of the trial court to grant a continuance of the cause for a period of a few days.

By stipulation of the parties, the cause had been placed on the trial calendar for trial during the week beginning May 12, 1930. The case was subject to call at any time during that week. On Thursday, the 15th,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ridings v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dilley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Middaugh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Good v. BonacumNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Freeman v. City of NelighNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Jordan v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API