Legal Opinion

Tuthill v. Union Savings Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alfred M. Lama, J.

This is a motion by defendant, the Union Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as Bank), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in the action.

The facts in the case are virtually undisputed. Jamesport Vineyards, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Jamesport) was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $140,000 with interest. The *732debt was evidenced by a bond and secured by a purchase-money mortgage on real property.

On December 23, 1983, plaintiff gave to Jamesport a satisfaction of the mortgage in exchange for which plaintiff received what purported to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy v. Merchants National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Hohenberg Co. v. Comitex Knitters Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tuthill v. Union Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API