Commonwealth v. Javier
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
In the process of applying for a search warrant, it is a necessary element that the observations recited in a supporting affidavit be reasonably contemporaneous with the time of the application. Commonwealth v. Atchue, 393 Mass. 343, 349 (1984). Commonwealth v. Morton, 26 Mass. App. Ct. 949, 950-951 (1988). So, for example, an observation in June, 1990, would generally not support an application for a search warrant presented to a magistrate in November, 1990. It is a serious defect in an affidavit if there is nothing in it which suggests the time the informer saw the illegal items or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Commonwealth v. AtchueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. MortonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RiceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MatiasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- COMMONWEALTH v. DANNY SUGGS.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995