Legal Opinion

Russell v. Wineburg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1923No. 14147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJe.xkins, P. J.

This was a suit in the municipal court of Macon for “ Bal. to Mdse, as per acet. stated, $9.00, which deft, promised to pay, but which he failed to pay.” The defendant specially demurred to the use of the words “ Balance to merchandise ” in the statement, and the demurrer was overruled. The evidence of the plaintiff that the defendant had acknowledged the correctness of the account and had agreed to pay it, and of another person to the same effect, was entirely uncontradicted. The trial judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff, for the amount sued for, and the judge of the superior court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Hendrix & HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Granite Corp. v. Union Granite Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Kilgore v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Walker v. Industrial Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Mutual Furniture Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Consolidated Van & Storage Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API