Legal Opinion
Westways World Travel v. AMR Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 10, 2001No. 2:99-cv-00386PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO FED. R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6).
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The Court, the Honorable Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered Defendants AMR Corporation (“AMR”), American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), American Eagle Holding Corporation (“American Eagle”), and Sabre Holdings Corporation (“Sabre”) (collectively, “Defendants”)’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Westways World Travel and Sundance Travel Service (“Plaintiffs”)’s first amended complaint…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Westways World Travel, Inc. v. AMR Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.