Legal Opinion

Hygrade Operators, Inc. v. Local 333, United Marine Division, I.L.A.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 11, 1990No. 90 Civ. 1031 (RPP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Hygrade Operators, Inc., Bush-ey Towing Co., Inc. and Tanker Ira S. Bushey, Inc. move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 to vacate, and defendant Local 333, United Marine Division, I.L.A., AFL-CIO (the “Union”) cross moves to affirm, an Arbitral Award (“A.A.”) dated December 28, 1989, finding plaintiffs had violated the no-lockout provision of a Collective Bargaining Agreement (the “Agreement”) and awarding the defendant $50,000 in damages.

At issue is whether the amount of the award has sufficient basis in fact…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Detroit Coil Company v. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Sears, Roebuck And Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hygrade Operators, Inc. v. Local 333, United Marine Division, ILACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Hygrade Operators, Inc. v. Local 333, United Marine Division, Ila, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API