Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bransford

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1980No. CA 80-203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

We are asked, mainly, to determine the effect of revocation of a clause in a will giving a portion of the residue of the estate. We must decide whether property which would have passed according to the revoked provision falls into the residue or passes by intestacy. We hold that it passes by intestacy, and because we cannot ascertain from the record the trial court’s disposition of the property in question, we remand the case.

The will originally provided for several specific bequests and division of the residue into four equal parts. Three of the parts were to go to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galloway v. DarbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Bronson v. PinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Cavanaugh v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bransford v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API