Legal Opinion

In re Rebman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

William Rebinan is the agent of Armour & Co., of Chicago, who are shippers of fresh dressed beef from Chicago to Norfolk for sale to consumers. A recent act of the legislature of Virginia imposes a charge of one cent a pound for inspection upon fresh meat intended for sale at places 100 miles and more from the places of slaughter, requires it to be inspected before it is offered for sale, and imposes a fine of $50 to $100 for selling without inspection. This lg,w was disregarded by Rebman, as violating the constitution of the United States. He made a sale of beef which had not been inspected,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York Commissioners of Immigration v. North German LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Walling v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex parte ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1895
  2. Territory ex rel. McLean & Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Territory ex rel. McLean & Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API