Legal Opinion

Brunton v. International Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 7, 1931No. 12,455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The question here presented is the correct interpretation of the word “lines” as used in two trust indentures which provide for the payment of income. To review a judgment of the trial court excluding grandchildren from participation during the lifetime of their parents this writ is prosecuted.

David W. and Katharine K. Brunton were husband and wife. They are hereinafter referred to as the father and mother. They had four children, Frederic K., Harold J., Marion B. and John D., who are hereinafter referred to as the children. The first three each had two children, hereinafter réferred to as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Weinreich Estate Co. v. A. J. Johnston Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Gourdin v. DeasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  4. Lycett v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Shoch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brunton v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. United States National Bank v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Brunton v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Stafford v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API