Hill v. Capitol Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard
This is an action on a life policy issued by defendant to one James D. Hill. Plaintiff, surviving wife, was the beneficiary. Hill’s note was accepted in payment of tbe first year’s premium. Within the year, as alleged in plaintiff’s third cause of action, but without her knowledge or consent, the insured received back his note and surrendered the policy to defendant, which destroyed and assumed to cancel the same; to which cancellation and destruction the plaintiff did not consent. Defendant, tendering’ the same issue, alleged in its second defense to plaintiff’s first cause of action that at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Griffith v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- New York Life Insurance v. PikeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- People v. MontagueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Morrison v. the Mutual L. Ins. of NYCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Viles v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.