Cramer v. Blooming Grove Mutual Fire Ins.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 28, Feb. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1915, No. 209, on verdict for plaintiff in case of D. W. Cramer and for use of R. F. Robinson v! Blooming Grove Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Whitehead, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 28, Feb. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1915, No. 209, on verdict for plaintiff in case of D. W. Cramer and for use of R. F. Robinson v! Blooming Grove Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Whitehead, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. When Harvey Aderhold, a witness for plaintiff, was on the stand having been recalled for examination in chief on behalf of the defendant, the following offer was made by defendant: Counsel for defendant propose to prove by witness on the stand that…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kephart, J.,
The plaintiff had his dwelling house insured by the defendant. Attached to the policy of insurance was a stipulation which read as follows: “The undersigned, in consideration of a policy of indemnity, against acci*281dental loss to above named property, hereby agrees to be subject to and observe all the by-laws, rules and regulations of the company during membership; ......to keep all ashes in fire-proof vessels, in cellar or vault or at a safe distance from insured property, to use coal only for fuel when steam power is used; to use or allow no unprotected light in or about…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lebanon Co. v. Franklin Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912