Legal Opinion

Nogar v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 2, 1973No. 41662PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion

ON REHEARING GRANTED

DEKLE, Justice.

We have for review on direct conflict certiorari1 the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported at 252 So.2d 301 (1971). Conflict is apparent with our decision in Mancini v. State, 273 So.2d 371 (Fla.1973) on the same point of law.

Our holding in Mancini requires here, as it did in that cause, that review of the sufficiency of the evidence may be considered upon the alternate basis of a motion for directed verdict presented to the trial judge, as well as upon the rule confirmed in this Court’s Owens v. State, 233 So.2d 389 (Fla.1970), following…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Mancini v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Pacetti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manning v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Earle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Kiely v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API