Legal Opinion

Petition of Featherfall Restoration

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 7, 2024No. 1313/22Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the Matter of the Petition of Featherfall Restoration LLC, No. 1313, September Term 2022. Opinion by Getty, Joseph M., J. HEADNOTES: INSURANCE – INSURANCE POLICIES – ANTI-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSES Maryland law recognizes the validity of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies. Maryland has not adopted Section 322 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, which distinguishes between pre- and post-loss assignments of benefits. When an insurance policy contains a valid anti-assignment clause, the clause prohibits assignments regardless of whether the claim was assigned before or after a loss…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API