Legal Opinion
San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1888No. 11212PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought for the claim and delivery of certain personal property. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which, and from an order refusing it a new trial, the plaintiff appeals. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
In this action the respondent asks that the appeal be dismissed, on the ground that the clerk’s certificate to the transcript is insufficient.
The certificate is as follows:—
“I, Thomas S. Bonneau, county clerk of the county of Marin, and ex officio clerk of the superior court in and for said county, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing transcript with the original papers now on file in my office, and that the said transcript is correct.”
Sections 950, 951, and 952 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide that the appellant must furnish copies of certain papers to this court on appeal.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bennett v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Wakeman v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by5 opinions
- Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Pierson v. MillisMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Murphy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bossen v. BeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923