Legal Opinion

Averill v. Red Lion

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1993No. A8812-06591; CA A65842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant notwithstanding a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor. She appeals on two grounds. First, she contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. because the motion was not timely filed. Second, she contends that the court erred in granting the motion because there was evidence to support the jury’s verdict in her favor. Defendant cross-assigns as error various trial court rulings related to the timeliness of the motion for judgment n.o.v. We reverse.

We review first the timeliness of the motion. The trial court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bella v. Aurora Air, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Unifund CCR Partners v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Averill v. Red LionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Duvall v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Duvall v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API