Williams v. Institute for Computational Studies at Colorado State University
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The sole issue to be decided in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying ICS’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for lack of personal jurisdiction. As to the claim of plaintiff Williams, we hold that the court had jurisdiction over ICS and properly denied the motion. As to the claims of plaintiffs Aup-perle and Pyle, however, we hold there is no personal jurisdiction; therefore, the court below erred in denying the motion as to those claims.
The pleadings, affidavits, and documents in the record as well as the testimony of plaintiff Williams tend to show the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Hardin v. York Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Golds v. Central Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.